Should I hire someone to setup Mixpanel?

Hi All! I’m involved in checking out Mixpanel, and I’m wondering if it’s more helpful to hire an expert to establish our Mixpanel for us. Has anyone hired a Mixpanel expert? If so, could you share what we should budget for an expert?


Mixpanel is very easy to setup. You’ll have to keep improving your tracking, best if your team goes through the tutorials and become familiar with it. If your team doesn’t have a lot of in-house expertise with event tracking and product analytics, you might benefit from finding an experienced Product Analyst to chat with about taxonomy and usage data strategy.


It is very important to be clear as to who will manage Mixpanel as I think many a times when no one owns it, that’s when it becomes a problem. It’s less of a skill gap and more, it’s no one’s job.


On the off chance that your group has relatively little in-house insight/skill with occasion following and item investigation, however, you may profit from tracking down an accomplished Product Analyst to visit with about scientific categorization and utilization information procedure.

I’ve seen this stuff go crazy before long, disintegrating the worth of the stage


I’ve carried out both Mixpanel and Amplitude this year for various customers and their separate items. I believe there’s a confusion that you must be truly specialized to utilize them when you don’t. Indeed, a dev should carry out the code, yet a large portion of the pre-instrumentation work ought to be finished by the item organization so they comprehend the intricate details of how their measurements are determined. Truly, in my experience, the foundation of most information issues lies in a) not making the following arrangement and b) helpless naming (scientific classification). Both Amplitude and Mixpanel have the following arrangement formats - strongly suggest. The main idea I’ll add is to add a section to these formats and stick a screen capture of where in the excursion every occasion ends up making it very understood. It’s tedious yet definitely worth the work.


To the extraordinary disturbance of each and every individual who’s each worked with me, I generally demand fabricating my own examination and channels. It’s not on the grounds that I’m acceptable at it (I’m not!) however it simply feels like until you’re elbows somewhere down in your information you never truly see how every one of the pieces cooperate.


This has given me a GREAT point of view on this. I truly like it.

Individual focus points (for me to return to: grin)

Get very involved, to truly see how everything works (I would probably need to expect the chief of the venture) and I truly like having somebody as a sounding board for technique.

The board goes past arrangements too. Ensure we have a reliable proprietor.

Referencing layouts are practically obligatory for arranging. I saw that they had them so I’m glad to hear they drive genuine worth.

1 Like

We’re shipping some exciting functionality our customers have been asking for first and then will likely get this setup shortly, if not immediately, after. I’ll be likely testing out the implementation templates in the meantime to plan it out and make it as easy on the tech team as possible.

1 Like

None of the devices I’ve assessed have truly nailed contextualizing these occasions, which puts a gigantic measure of intellectual burden on nearly everybody associated with instrumentation.

Plentifulness began down this way with their Figma module, yet it’s a little on the rough side.

I’m truly confident that Avo (or a comparable item) will ponder something like this down the line since it appears they’re explicitly focused on making instrumentation simpler for all interested parties.

This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.